Environment Finance Human Rights Politics OU College Republicans and College Democrats face off in debate By Nicole Rhoads Posted on March 11, 2016 4 min read 0 0 0 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Google+ Share on Reddit Share on Pinterest Share on Linkedin Share on Tumblr Photo by Rachel Niemi The Ohio University College Republicans and the College Democrats debated economic, social and environmental issues Thursday at Morton Hall. The OU Economics Society organized the event with the Campus Involvement Center and The New Political, and three members from both College Republicans and College Democrats participated in the event on behalf of their groups. President Sam Kissinger of the Economics Society and Editor-in-Chief Olivia Miltner of The New Political and moderated the two-hour debate. Foreign policy and economic recession raised heated discussion between the participants. When it came to foreign policy, the College Republicans stood firm with the idea that border control, whether it be a wall or otherwise, is the best way to fix the illegal immigrant problem. The College Democrats said making citizenship easier was a better option. “National security, protecting our allies and keeping our people safe is the biggest issues right now” @OUCRs #OUDebates — TNP Live (@TNPLive) March 11, 2016 When it came to renewable energy resources, the College Democrats said the country cannot rely on fossil fuels. The College Republicans, however, said renewable energy sources are currently not economically sustainable and that abundant fossil fuels should be used to help keep the country afloat. Although there were many questions that caused debate, some issues turned bipartisan. Those issues were same-sex marriage, transgender rights, marijuana legalization and PAC spending for presidential campaigns. Both parties were able to come to an agreement that presidential campaigns should not be spending so much money. Both groups said the money being used to fund campaigns could be put to better use. “Imagine what we could do with $1 billion, we could be helping so many people instead of wasting it on political ads” @OUCRs #OUDebates — TNP Live (@TNPLive) March 11, 2016 The moderators announced two five minute breaks in between sections of the debate. During the breaks the lecture hall was buzzing with conversation. “It was a cool thing to come to,” Olivia Gatto, a debate attendee, said. “It’s great that people can come together different views and all.” Students were voicing their opinions and tweeting questions to the groups via the hashtag #OUDebates. Comments on the twitter hashtag ranged from students counter-arguing statements from the parties to providing questions for the moderators. What about regulations on fracking wastewater? I’d like to hear comments from both parties on environmental regulation. #OUDebates — Bethany N. Bella (@bethanynbella) March 11, 2016 Participants encouraged the crowd to vote March 15 in the Ohio primary.